Modification History
Release 1
This is the first release of this unit.
Unit Descriptor
This unit involves the skills and knowledge required to assess and report on vessel trim and intact stability as part of the survey function. It is limited to undertaking practical stability tests, simplified stability calculations, reporting inclining experiments and consideration of damage stability implications.
Application of the Unit
This unit applies to people working in the maritime industry as a domestic commercial vessel marine surveyor and may form part of accreditation requirements for surveyors under Australian legislation.
Licensing/Regulatory Information
Not applicable.
Pre-Requisites
Not applicable.
Employability Skills Information
This unit contains employability skills.
Elements and Performance Criteria Pre-Content
Elements describe the essential outcomes of a unit of competency. |
Performance criteria describe the required performance needed to demonstrate achievement of the element. Assessment of performance is to be consistent with the evidence guide. |
Elements and Performance Criteria
1 |
Plan and prepare stability testing |
1.1 |
Applicable stability criteria for class of vessel and its operations are identified and confirmed against regulatory requirements |
1.2 |
Differences between Uniform Shipping Laws (USL) and National Standard for Commercial Vessels (NSCV) standards for assessing stability are identified and applied to survey plan as required |
||
1.3 |
Information and data is used to establish and verify stability characteristics required for safe operation |
||
1.4 |
Types of stability related hazards that may occur during all types of operations are identified |
||
1.5 |
Range of intended and/or likely vessel loading conditions are accurately identified and their impact on stability is assessed |
||
2 |
Calculate vessel trim and stability |
2.1 |
Simplified stability calculations are performed to assess compliance with applicable stability criteria |
2.2 |
Stability assessment methods for equivalent solutions are applied as necessary according to regulatory requirements |
||
2.3 |
Trim, draughts and freeboard are measured accurately to safely and efficiently allow assessment of compliance with criteria |
||
2.4 |
Effects of weight distribution that may compromise vessel safety are included in stability assessment |
||
2.5 |
Computer-based stability programs are used as appropriate to assist with assessing compliance |
||
2.6 |
Results are verified to confirm compliance |
||
2.7 |
Vessel is not put at risk during assessment |
||
3 |
Apply tests, assessments and theories to confirm compliance |
3.1 |
Tests and assessments that could assist to confirm stability compliance are verified and carried out according to safety instructions |
3.2 |
Small angle stability theories are used to establish metacentric height (GM) through transverse movement of weights across vessel deck |
||
3.3 |
Causes of inaccuracies and limitations of assumptions in tests, assessments and theories are interpreted accurately and considered in stability assessment report |
||
4 |
Identify other impacts on stability calculations |
4.1 |
Types and effects of damage on vessel stability are identified and considered according to regulatory requirements |
4.2 |
Damage stability considerations are accurately identified and effect of damage is correctly quantified |
||
4.3 |
Operational impact on stability is identified and considered in compliance assessment |
||
4.4 |
Vessel safety management plan is reviewed to ensure known or likely impacts on stability are included |
||
5 |
Document and report findings |
5.1 |
Records are maintained and reports are prepared according to regulatory and organisational guidelines |
5.2 |
Survey report is completed according to regulatory requirements |
Required Skills and Knowledge
This section describes the skills and knowledge required for this unit. |
Required Skills: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required Knowledge: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence Guide
The evidence guide provides advice on assessment and must be read in conjunction with the performance criteria, the required skills and knowledge, the range statement and the Assessment Guidelines for the Training Package. |
|
Critical aspects for assessment and evidence required to demonstrate competency in this unit |
The evidence required to demonstrate competence in this unit must be relevant to and satisfy all of the requirements of the Elements, Performance Criteria, Required Skills, Required Knowledge and include:
|
Context of and specific resources for assessment |
Performance is demonstrated consistently over time and in a suitable range of contexts. Resources for assessment include access to:
In both real and simulated environments, access is required to:
|
Method of assessment |
Practical assessment must occur in an:
A range of assessment methods should be used to assess practical skills and knowledge. The following examples are appropriate to this unit:
|
Guidance information for assessment |
Holistic assessment with other units relevant to the industry sector, workplace and job role is recommended. In all cases where practical assessment is used it should be combined with targeted questioning to assess Required Knowledge. Assessment processes and techniques must be appropriate to the language and literacy requirements of the work being performed and the capacity of the candidate. |
Range Statement
The range statement relates to the unit of competency as a whole. It allows for different work environments and situations that may affect performance. Bold italicised wording, if used in the performance criteria, is detailed below. |
|
Applicable stability criteria may include: |
|
Regulatory requirements may include: |
|
Information and data may include: |
|
Tests and assessments may include: |
|
Types and effects of damage may include: |
|
Stability considerations may include: |
|
Operational impact may include: |
|
Unit Sector(s)
Not applicable.
Competency Field
Marine Surveying